The Jehovah's Witnesses returned once again last week, just as I was heading out the door. Two middle-aged women appeared at the gate in agreeably beige coats, bearing up against the last of the winter chill, and probably a few frosty receptions before they got to me. I wasn't much in the mood, but I had sort of looked forward to meeting them again and debating with them about various theological inconsistencies. Also, despite their wonky beliefs, they were genuinely pleasant people who thought they were making a positive impact in the world, so I gave them some of my time.
The usual openers of how there was so much evil in the world wasn't heading in a particularly interesting direction (I fail to see how such a committed theist can acknowledge a situation where evil - usually blamed on the devil - can exist and perpetuate with a supposed perfect, capable and loving god watching over us), so I steered things towards the subject of the creation, figuring these people were most likely creationists. I asked them what their opinion of ancient fossils were.
'We believe that the universe is only a few thousand years old', one said.
'God created us and everything on the planet', said the other.
I've pondered the ability of these statements to stand on their own feet for a while now. It asks questions about god's motives when the world is made to look much older than what it apparently is (suggesting a deceit) but also queries another aspect of an all powerful being: intelligence.
Many well-structured arguments against creation are stopped in their tracks by the twin put-downs of 'who are we to question gods ways' and 'we are human; we cannot comprehend his big plan'. When not using those little sidesteps, any reasoning along the lines of creation of the earth in seven days ultimately leads to god existing outside of time, and so can achieve anything. This got me thinking.
'How intelligent is God?', I asked.
The ladies stood there for a moment and pondered my question. I assured them I wasn't trying to lure them into a trap. Turning to one of the women I asked (as politely as possible) how intelligent she thought she was.
'Reasonably', she said, guardedly.
And so I began my argument. It went something like this:
Imagine for a moment, that you are really passionate about building model aeroplanes. You have loads of them in your house, and you take great care over the building and painting of each one, so they are as perfect as they can be. Now imagine that you are suddenly tasked with building 10,000 model aircraft. Each of the same design. No matter how much you loved doing it, you wouldn't want to do 10,000 and you would be sick of them if you made it to the end.
This is because you are an intelligent person; and repetitive tasks - no matter how much fun they might be at the start - become tiresome.
Now scale that up. Instead of one model aircraft, you have a million different kinds, of all shapes and sizes, made up of different parts and substances and complexities, and each model type has between 1 and a trillion models to be made. And you have to repeat the task for all eternity.
This is the work that God apparently has to do. Or rather, it's the work that he has apparently foisted upon himself, being the ultimate creator of our universe and all within it.
It was obvious by now the analogy I was trying to make, but as I suspected, the ladies would argue the wrong point away.
'But God exists outside of time', one said, 'he can create any number of beings in a blink of an eye'.
I countered; 'Well, even if we could somehow accept such a claim, it is God's intelligence that proves your creation theory false. I repeat: how intelligent do you think God is?'.
The women realised anything less than infinite intelligence would doom them to be pushed into a pit of hell or something, so I took their stares as an implicit answer.
A being of infinite, - or even merely super-human - intelligence is not going to lumber himself with such a repetitive system. Regardless of whether he can make time to do it or not, the constant repetition required would make him a prisoner of his own work.
'Don't think you are doing your God a disservice by claiming a system of creation so short-minded that he would trap himself in this way?', I asked to no audible reply.
A being of even reasonable intelligence, at the point where he was planning the universe he was about to create, would contemplate the consequences of any road he goes down. Rather than lumbering himself with the task of creating and re-creating life over and over for all eternity - and we are assuming the earth is the only place in the massive universe that this is happening - wouldn't it be far more practical to create a single spark of life, imbue it with the ability to mutate and reproduce, and then set it free in a quiet corner of the universe to do it's thing all on it's own, and watch as it grows and develops.
Though I do not go for the idea of a God as the ultimate source of all things, we know so little about the origins of the universe prior to the big bang, that a giant celestial experimenter kicking things off and then lying back and observing the results is as good as any we are going to get in the near future. And what a beautiful idea; one that fits with our knowledge of evolutionary history and biology, of fossil records and of the origins of the universe, of the destruction and rebirth of worlds and galaxies as they collide in the chaos, and the danger and savagery of animal survival.
But it also allows the ones who want to believe in a god to have one - the guy who had the forethought to put it all into action. Such a deity who was the creator of the universe and all the beauty deserves a bit of respect, and if as some posit, he is just lying back and observing the results - however they turn out - as a scientist would, then there is also no need to consider him to be the presiding judge of our actions because in his experiment we are all part of the results whatever they may be. Morality and behaviour - that is down to us.
The women had by this point begun to glance at their watches, and since I had made my point, I let them leave; they said they found what I had to say 'interesting', although it is unlikely they would be leaving the secure and comforting bosom of their alpha course just yet. Hopefully however, I may have sown a couple of seeds of doubt.
Some atheists may see this as a soft line, keeping God in the mix, but I don't see any profit to be had by trying to force people who don't want to let go of God to do so. The universe is so vast and we are so minuscule within it, that our tiny lives would be of no concern to a higher being; and so really, it makes no difference for our salvation whether we believe in one or not. What is important (as I have said in the past and would guess any caring god would agree), is that we are properly educated, and throw off those beliefs which are obviously, demonstrably wrong, beliefs that waste lives and sometimes cause harm when they are forcibly applied. If an argument that acknowledges the possibility of a remote God while steering them away from these standpoints can be persuasive enough to satisfy both what they see and want to believe, that's good enough for me.
BIFF 2011 and More
This blog has unfortunately at the moment descended into a load of long posts about Japan (want to get it done as soon as I can) which is regrettable, so here's a little bit of some other stuff.
As we wait for the 24th of February to come around, and I consider whether it is worth spending some wad on the horrendously expensive festival pass, my thoughts turned to the more regular film output going on.
I was disappointed to hear that 'Inside Job', the top documentary from last year would only be getting a very limited UK release; so limited in fact that it has come and gone. It was last Friday, and only in London with a couple of others spotted around the UK. Hopefully the DVD will be along at some point and a wider audience will be able to catch it. Criminal.
So when me and a friend headed out to the cinema it was to see one of two prospective films. True Grit, the new Coen brothers film which has been getting some great reviews, or Paul, which in the trailers features a wise cracking American alien talking about probing people. You can probably tell which way I was trying to go.
As things turned out, we decided to see the one which worked out best time-wise; we were seeing the Yes Prime Minister play at Leeds first. By chance, Paul started first, so with a few reservations I gave in and saw it.
And I have to say I was pleasantly surprised. No, really.
To those who as I did slated it because of the oh so humorous clips used by T4 and similar to highlight the whole probing gag line, please ignore them. I came away with the impression on watching those clips that it would be a childish road movie with a limited breadth of humour, but it's actually far broader than that. Pegg and Frost play grown up sci-fi nuts on a once in a lifetime trip across America, visiting the ComicCon and all the official 'alien abduction' sites like Area 51. Partway round, they bump into Paul the alien who has escaped and is on the run, and consequently they get caught up in the chase, while avoiding angry rednecks, incompetent agents, and the nutjob creationist father of Ruth, who has a revelation about her beliefs and decides to join them on the journey.
For a two-hour comedy road film, it had to have plenty of variety to keep us entertained, and it does this not only by having a tightly written script and a completely believable alien (you just can't see the join these days) but also it's another of those films that breathes with references to other films, comics, games and geek culture (I hate that term). The film is overflowing with references, and many of them are very subtle and obscure. This obviously increases rewatch value (and I hope it means we get a Scott Pilgrim-style DVD extra revealing them all).
Overall, very glad I saw it, and would more than happily see it again. Even if you don't 'get' the references, there's enough here for anyone to enjoy. I'd even say it trumps Pegg and Frosts' other two films, Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz in terms of laughs and value. 8/10
True Grit will have to wait til next week.
As we wait for the 24th of February to come around, and I consider whether it is worth spending some wad on the horrendously expensive festival pass, my thoughts turned to the more regular film output going on.
I was disappointed to hear that 'Inside Job', the top documentary from last year would only be getting a very limited UK release; so limited in fact that it has come and gone. It was last Friday, and only in London with a couple of others spotted around the UK. Hopefully the DVD will be along at some point and a wider audience will be able to catch it. Criminal.
So when me and a friend headed out to the cinema it was to see one of two prospective films. True Grit, the new Coen brothers film which has been getting some great reviews, or Paul, which in the trailers features a wise cracking American alien talking about probing people. You can probably tell which way I was trying to go.
As things turned out, we decided to see the one which worked out best time-wise; we were seeing the Yes Prime Minister play at Leeds first. By chance, Paul started first, so with a few reservations I gave in and saw it.
And I have to say I was pleasantly surprised. No, really.
To those who as I did slated it because of the oh so humorous clips used by T4 and similar to highlight the whole probing gag line, please ignore them. I came away with the impression on watching those clips that it would be a childish road movie with a limited breadth of humour, but it's actually far broader than that. Pegg and Frost play grown up sci-fi nuts on a once in a lifetime trip across America, visiting the ComicCon and all the official 'alien abduction' sites like Area 51. Partway round, they bump into Paul the alien who has escaped and is on the run, and consequently they get caught up in the chase, while avoiding angry rednecks, incompetent agents, and the nutjob creationist father of Ruth, who has a revelation about her beliefs and decides to join them on the journey.
For a two-hour comedy road film, it had to have plenty of variety to keep us entertained, and it does this not only by having a tightly written script and a completely believable alien (you just can't see the join these days) but also it's another of those films that breathes with references to other films, comics, games and geek culture (I hate that term). The film is overflowing with references, and many of them are very subtle and obscure. This obviously increases rewatch value (and I hope it means we get a Scott Pilgrim-style DVD extra revealing them all).
Overall, very glad I saw it, and would more than happily see it again. Even if you don't 'get' the references, there's enough here for anyone to enjoy. I'd even say it trumps Pegg and Frosts' other two films, Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz in terms of laughs and value. 8/10
True Grit will have to wait til next week.
Labels:
2011 Film Festivals,
film festivals,
film reviews,
films
Japan 2010: 12 - Where I see the Second Bomb
My bladder finally motivated me to make a start and by 8am I was dressed and sat downstairs in the communal room waiting for Yukari (the lady of the house) to appear. She had mentioned as part of the introductions the evening before about an optional Japanese or English style breakfast, so feeling a little homesick I decided to give the English one a go. Adenata came down as I was ordering and sat at the computer and we chatted for a while about Mt. Aso and my experiences at the Fukuno-yu onsen the night before. Adenata reacted with great interest; she was apparently a bit of a connoisseur when it came to spas and onsen and was on her own little quest to visit as many as she could on her holiday.
The breakfast arrived. It had some English qualities; there was a fried egg and bacon, and the thickest slice of toasted bread I had ever seen. This went down well, and the pear and side salad, though unusual was consumed with enthusiasm also.
I explained my intentions to Adenata; I was heading firstly to the Peace Park at the north end, and then following the attractions south until I was back in the centre once again, at which point I would choose a few other places to go depending on the time remaining. Oh, and that giant Buddha was also going to get a proper visit too. Adenata had already seen much of what central Nagasaki had to offer the previous day, and said she was heading north to the not very Japanese sounding Huis Ten Bosch, a popular Dutch theme park that attempts to recreate the Netherlands right in the heart of Japan.
Hotel Review: Nagasaki Kagamaya (2200 yen/night, 2 nights)
Situated at the end of the #5 tram route, it's a bit of a fiddle to find, but well directed by the family that runs the place, who are helpful and attentive, speak very good English and have a very useful website to help you get there. They make you feel well at home. The house is a very nicely kept building in a traditional Ryokan style and you are made very welcome. Even though it is far from the centre of town, I'd come again. (one tip: bring slippers if you can as the beautiful wooden stairs are large and hard on the feet!). Laundry service (Wash/dry) is 500yen, done for you. Breakfast is 500yen. Towel hire: 100yen.
8/10
8/10
On the outer edge of the hypocentre were a set of steps down to another exhibit, and most people I think would miss it as it's pretty easy to pass without realising. Only once you read the accompanying sign do you realise the amount of geological disruption that the bomb produced.
I wasn't expecting to be able to take pictures, but was still absent-mindedly dangling my camera by the wrist strap. I walked in past a crowd of children and their teachers sat on the floor, and into the greeting room; a woman behind a reception desk gave me a guide to the building, and asked if I was going to take pictures. When I reacted with surprise she explained that they don't normally allow it, but if I wore one of their special arm bands (I would officially be a 'Photographer') I would be allowed. Taking the opportunity I snapped it up right there. I bought two tickets at their automated machine (wasted money on a childs ticket by mistake grr!) and then went in.
The A-Bomb museum is every bit as sobering and disturbing as the one at Hiroshima, and I defy anyone with ridiculous notions of any of it being worth it 'in the name of stopping the war' to see what is there and remain steadfast in their belief. Nothing is worth this level of sacrifice.
The last area of the indoor section highlighted the more current and pressing situation of continued atomic bomb deployment and detonation. How many atomic bombs have been actually detonated since these first two? None? A few? A hundred?
Not even close.
To provide a reassuring balance, the lower half of the exhibit describes the anti-nuclear actions of people around the world, and the work they have done to temper this progression. Thankfully as we head to the present day, the work appears to be paying off, but not before the most up to date sections warn of the potential threats on the horizon.
Even so, it's all very chilling; just as before there are no happy feelings at the end, but this sort of thing however depressing should be taught and re-taught to everyone, or else we will make similar mistakes in the future with weapons more powerful still.
Still reeling from the horrors within, I ascended the gentle slope at the end back to ground level, but not before the creators of the museum cannily stuck a small but noticeable bookshop in the way. Four or five shelves, and about ten feet square worth of space given primarily to the sale of books and a little bit of manga - mostly from Japan but a few from other parts of the world - on the subjects of war and suffering. They had a similar one at the end of the Hiroshima museum, and if I had the money or the room back then I would have picked some up. This time I was not going away empty handed, although I was wincing at the prospect of adding yet more weight to my already bulging backpacks. What I got would have to be a balance between culturally weighty and physically light.
Incredibly, I was there completely on my own; the attendant was waiting respectfully outside and none of the other tourists had come in. I was alone in the silence, except for the quiet trickling and gurgling of water shimmering on the glass ceiling above. Again, there are numerous benches to sit on around the periphery of the room, and I took the opportunity to take it all in.
I had a streetcar map that showed many of the tourist spots, but wasn't to scale. Consequently, something that appeared to be just across the road and down a bit, wasn't. I spent a bit of time trying to find the science museum across the tracks but gave up and instead happened upon the 'one-legged Torii' gate after some searching, which was coincidentally what several schoolchildren were doing.
Masaharu died some years ago and this museum is his legacy; he was passionate about bringing the treatment of the Korean immigrants into Japan before, during and after the war, something that Japan has been very reluctant to face up to, and is not mentioned in the main, government funded museums. It was for this reason that I thought it was important to see while here.
Inside I was surprised to be greeted by a youngish German man and his middle-aged Japanese assistant. He could speak some English and was clearly happy to have a tourist visit what appeared to be quite an under-appreciated place. I mentioned the museums' presence in the Japan By Rail book and he was clearly pleased, and told me that a couple of days previous they had been visited by another Yorkshireman!
I perused the gift shop and bought a Nagasaki fridge magnet, and tried to work out why they were stocking little London taxis and telephone boxes (the Glovers were Scottish!), but finally after a little polite coughing by staff who were waiting to go home, I emerged into the evening dusk. As I descended the steep road back to the station, the shops were closing their doors and windows, and the holiday tourist part of the day had finished. Tomorrow, I was leaving Nagasaki to head north again, but there was still plenty of places I wanted to see. One more spot couldn't hurt, even if it was closing. It was 5.30 in the evening so there was a good chance I was going to be disappointed, but the Koshi-Byo Confucius Shrine, the only one of its sort made outside China by Chinese hands, may still be open. Shrines are not typically closed off to the public, except for the very large ones, and remain open throughout the day, at least as far as the surrounding grounds go. However I had to find it first, and the map was not much use. As the evening light faded to nothing and the night lights began to take over, my enthusiasm to look around the next corner waned, particularly as I seemed to be heading off the tourist trail. A shrine-like building on the hills above that was all boarded up was the closest I had found, and it didn't look very Chinese, or very accessible. I called it a day.
Ah yes, the onsen. It was around this time yesterday that I had got my first taste of it, and I suddenly wanted more. I returned to the hostel, dropped off my things and picked up a towel, and caught the 7.20 bus with a degree of authority and confidence.
As the bus door opened, I was greeted by a familiar face; Adenata had returned from the north and had followed my suggestion of trying Fukuno-yu out. We chatted away as the bus ascended the hill, and I spent a few hours repeating the relaxing bliss of the night before, only this time with an air of confidence, I was a seasoned onsen-goer now. On the way out, before the last bus disappeared, I had a quick go with a tank of Garra Rufa fish, the same ones who nibbled my hands in the Kagoshima hotel some days previous and are now the latest craze in the UK, who were now ruthlessly stripping my feet of any dead skin they could find.
The bus dropped me off at the train station, which was still lit up at 10pm. I had looked with some curiosity before leaving at the tall AMU building that was part of the complex. Still with some energy to explore, I decided to had inside to see what I was missing. The building has 5 or so floors, the two upper ones reserved for commercial shops, cinemas and restaurants, all in super clean sparkling neon and metal. The cinema was still showing Arrietty, to my surprise as it was now several months since release, and the upper floor bulged with restaurants. Most were Japanese, although there was also a Steakhouse, an Italian and an Indian. To my regret I had eaten at the onsen once more, and even I'm not that greedy.
I reached the hostel around 10.30. Adenata had returned some time ago; we had a final chat over some green tea as she was emailing her friends, and then we headed off to bed in the small hours.
Labels:
Japan,
japan 2010,
japan holiday,
Nagasaki
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)